Karadeniz Ereğli Integrated Works

Erdemir · steel · Karadeniz Ereğli
iz · TR-MRV-Bench v0.1
erdemir-eregli
Issued: 2024

1 · Facility identity

Company / operator
Erdemir
Plant name
Karadeniz Ereğli Integrated Works
Sector (CBAM scope)
steel
Location
Karadeniz Ereğli, Türkiye
Nameplate capacity
4,000,000 t/y

2 · Emission figures (tCO₂)

Audit-grade Scope 1 · 2024
6,673,266
disclosure · derived · operator_audited
cf-corrected formula (leave-one-plant-out)
7,288,906
cap × route-EF × cf (formula within +9.2% of audit)
EU CBAM default value
7,600,000
(EU default overstates by +14%)

95% conformal prediction interval (global, n=21 calibration): 3,858,906 – 16,342,218 tCO₂. Restricted to steel-BF/BOF stratum: 6,606,594 – 9,545,477 tCO₂ (subject to small-n undercoverage).

3 · Source citation for audit-grade Scope 1

Erdemir 2024 IAR (group 17.34M − İsdemir 10.66M from p115)

Subtraction: Ereğli ≈ Group − İsdemir; assumes no other major subsidiary

4 · Methodology (cf-corrected formula)

The headline method is a closed-form physics baseline: Scope 1 ≈ nameplate capacity × route emission-factor × capacity factor, using only operator-published numbers. It is evaluated leave-one-plant-out: each plant's route emission-factor is derived only from the other audit-grade plants in its route, so no plant contributes to its own prediction. Headline: +82.3% log-MAE reduction vs the EU CBAM default across the 19 validatable plants (of 21 audit-grade; two single-plant routes — N₂O-controlled and blender fertilizer — cannot be independently validated and are excluded). External validity: the same formula on 372 EUTL-verified EU cement installations gives a median ratio ≈1.0 vs the EU default's ≈2.5×. An optional in-browser WebGPU model (iz) is shipped as a demo only; it does not beat this formula at current data scale.

5 · Verifier checklist

  1. ☐ Confirm Scope 1 line item in the cited source matches the value above (tCO₂ basis; not CO₂-equivalent if different).
  2. ☐ Verify operator's verification statement (ISO 14064-1 / TSRS / financial audit) attached to the source.
  3. ☐ Cross-check capacity against latest published cement / steel / aluminum / fertilizer association registry.
  4. ☐ If using the formula prediction as input to a CBAM Article 4(2) actual-emission declaration: it is a model estimate, not a measurement. Verifier must independently support the underlying activity data.
  5. ☐ Confirm the conformal prediction interval covers the operator's claimed Scope 1.

6 · License and citation

TR-MRV-Bench v0 is Apache-2.0 licensed. The benchmark, methodology, and per-facility data are public at github.com/abgnydn/iz and iz-b0n.pages.dev. Cite: Günaydın (2026), "TR-MRV-Bench: a public per-facility emissions benchmark for Turkish CBAM-scope industry, with a physics baseline that beats the EU CBAM default by +82.3% (leave-one-plant-out, n=19)."